In article <1j2ng5INN60k@manuel.anu.edu.au> cogan@merlin.anu.edu.au (Bruce Cogan) writes:
>
>Thanks to all who replied to my query:
>
>
>>Can anyone provide a good reason why I should pay the extra money
>>for an LX to be used in a scientific/engineering environment?
>
>
>I can summarize the replies as follows:
>
>One reply from Switzerland said the LX was cheaper there. The
>second said that the IPX was no longer sold there. Replies from
>the US and Sweden both reported the LX cheaper.
>
>
>Recommendation: unless you really need an LX feature, get the IPX. Save
> your money to upgrade in the future if necessary."
>
Hmmm, I am obviously coming into this late, but here in Houston
the LX is about $700 cheaper than the IPX. And I sure wish it
was the other way.
Kelly
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:07:23 CDT