SUMMARY: Question about 101318-* patches

From: Robert Kline (rkline@spock.wcupa.edu)
Date: Wed Jul 27 1994 - 22:28:28 CDT


My original question was:

> I am running a Solaris 2.3 system with the 101318-31 jumbo kernel patch.
> I would like to update this to a later version. Following this newsgroup
> convinces me that there are some problems with these later versions.
>
> It appears that 101318-45 is acceptable except that it breaks syslogd.
>
> Is this correct?
>
> If so, my question then is:
>
> Can I add the patch 101318-45 and then simply use the rev. -31 syslogd?
>
> A recent SUMMARY suggests that someone has done something similar ( using
> the syslogd from rev. -42 ).

Thanks to the following people for responding:

jun@curie.ssctr.bcm.tmc.edu
aidan@cse.unsw.edu.au
sunservice!consol1!con_ast@Germany.Sun.COM
casper@fwi.uva.nl
boenning@igd.fhg.de
cygan@wpm.com
Steve.Kirkpatrick@artecon.com
strombrg@bingy.acs.uci.edu
nmurray@computing-science.aberdeen.ac.uk
worsham@aer.com

I was advised to get patch 101318-50 and patch 101869-01 which fixes the
problems caused by patch 101318-50. I just installed these two and things
are working out fine.

Thanks again for your help!

==============================================
Robert Kline
Computer Science Department
West Chester University
West Chester, PA 19383
Phone: 610-436-2181
e-mail: rkline@wcupa.edu
==============================================



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Sep 28 2001 - 23:09:06 CDT